Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:50 am
Interesting thread. I guess the obvious question about the Poumondeau set is 'why?'. Simple diaphragm or bellows-activated lever arms and upstream seats were prior art many times over - far pre-dating the CG45 or the Poumondeau. The regulator mechanism in the Poumondeau was not the same as the Commeinhes (as reported) but that makes little difference, since the Commeinhes units were based on the Rene Commeinhes patent (Georges father) which had fallen into the public domain before the Poumandeau was developed.
The thread did lead me to Sam Miller's article on Cousteau,'Gagnon'(sic)and the development of the 'Waterlung'. I hadn't seen this particular article before . . a wonderful pastiche of fact, fiction and 'from my perspective'-ness. I think that Sam M. had previously qualified similar stuff as "at least, that's what Sam Lecocg told me".
The 1870's R/D 'aerophore' was a true demand system but lacked the hp stage (the back-pack reservoir could only handle about 450 psi and was intended only as a 'bail-out' system) since it was surface supplied. The suck-on-it-and-you-get-air systems were available in many variations well before any of the early scuba gear and the specific designs were largely in the public domain by the time Commeinhes, Gagnan, Poumandeau came on the scene. That's why the 'claims' on most patents for free-swimming air gear were for such things as reserve valves, exhaust mechanism and position, and so on.
The MSA military tank bail-out demand regulator was virtually identical to the 'Waterlung' second stage - (diaphragm at mouth, tilt valve, mushroom valve exhaust in same can as diaphragm, etc.) feed it LP air through a short hose from any one of dozens of available small O2 or air HP first stages and you have it - and that reg came out in the 1930's!
Yipes! another manuscript of pontifications . . .
P.