I have actually measured the volume of most of my steel 72, using water. I precisely weighted the tanks and the water it can hold. I have done various PST and Norris tanks (plus one Walter Kidde).
I also have manufacturer data from PST.
The equivalent air volume that I have measure range from 70.3 to 72.2 cu ft at 2475 psi (most of them are somewhere around 71 cu ft).
This variation in volume is not surprising considering the fabrication method used for this type of pressure vessel.
Robohips77 wrote:
That + rating if it is followed all the way through most of my cave training... about 2 of the 6 manuals of my training on tanks sizing and their non similarities are based on the no + ratings on the tanks.
I guess that I am not surprised about this statement considering the amount of miss-information in our sport (especially when it comes to tanks and some other aspects involving physics); it seems that cave diving training is no exception.
SurfLung wrote:You guys are a bit beyond me here. Are you saying my 80cf tank is not really 80cf at the 3,442 psi pressure that's stamped on it?
Those tanks are rated at 3442 psi since that is the only working pressure… there is no overfilling.
Now to confuse things a little, I also measure my wife’s 80 cu ft HP tanks (made by PST, original hydro 2005). The volume in her tanks came out about 85 cu ft at 3442 psi. This is very strange, but I checked my measurements and calculations several times. I don’t think that I made a mistake, but I will not double check until next hydro test (I don’t feel like getting the inside wet only for this purpose).
I don’t know if your Worthington tanks run different than the advertised.
I am very surprised for these two PST tanks to be advertised that much lower than actual. The 5 cu ft difference on an 80 cu ft (or 85 cu ft) tank is a large difference. IMO it is too much difference to be explained with the normal fabrication variances.