Forum rules
Discussion of diving methods and equipment available prior to the development of BCDs beyond the horse collar. This forum is dedicated to the pre-1970 diving.
standingup

need some advice please

Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:58 pm

When last I used double hose it was with steel 72's @ 2000 lbs---- Now with these dang new al 80 @ 3000- do I need to bleed them down to 2000 to use my rebuilt double hose aqua master-- or will the regulator take the 3000 lbs
thanks for your thoughts

User avatar
captain
Plank Owner
Posts: 1440
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:32 am
Location: LaPlace, LA

Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:23 pm

U S Navy used them at 3000 psi, not a problem
Captain

User avatar
YankDownUnder
Master Diver
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact: Website

Tanks pressures...

Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:45 pm

The working pressure stamped on my 1954 Broxton triples is 2600 psi, so apparently high presurre is not a new thing. 3000 psi aluminum 72s were being sold by US Divers concurrently with the last of the Aqua Masters. The tanks were lousy, but the regulator worked fine.

The US Navy non-mag 90s were 3000 psi working pressure tanks and the regulator was basically an Aqua Master with a normal yoke and a different paint job. (I have one in new condition and the yoke appears like any other.) Again, the tanks were lousy, but I had no trouble using an Aqua Master on mine.

Now I have a Royal Aqua Master, which has a long yoke and I use it on Faber 3400 psi (232 bar) tanks with no problems so far.

standingup

Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:06 am

did they change the al 80 after the 1980's if not why did they catch on, over the steel

User avatar
captain
Plank Owner
Posts: 1440
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:32 am
Location: LaPlace, LA

Mon Aug 28, 2006 11:14 am

The aluminum 72 had bad bouyancy characteristics. Aluminum was being advertized as rust free with no need for internal inspections, that didn't last too long
Captain

User avatar
JES
Plank Owner
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:23 pm
First Name: Joseph
Location: Fleming Island, FL

Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:24 pm

standingup wrote:did they change the al 80 after the 1980's if not why did they catch on, over the steel
IMHO there are three major reasons that aluminum 80's caught on;

1) Price
2) Price
3) And Finally Price

The difference in the cost of a steel tank compared to the cost of an aluminum tank is very large. A steel 80 tank can set you back $300.00 while an aluminum 80 can be purchased for about $120.00. :shock:

I firmly believe that steel is by far the better choice. However, for the majority of divers it is hard to justify the price difference. :(
NAVED Master Diver #108
'Anima Sana In Corpore Sano’

User avatar
1969ivan1
Plank Owner
Posts: 1656
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:15 pm
First Name: rob
Location: CINCINNATI, OHIO

Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:35 pm

JES is right as usual.

User avatar
treasureman
Master Diver
Posts: 412
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: Ottawa Canada
Contact: Website

Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:50 pm

I buyt used steel 72 , hydro and vip foir under 120 cdn which is a steal pardon the pun. I strip em and galvilite them and dive em til they turn blue. Steel is the way to go and steel 72 can be had cheap
NAVED # 133...

Bon Vivant, and treasure finder

User avatar
Nemrod
VDH Moderator
Posts: 1435
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:53 pm
First Name: James
Location: Kansas

Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:18 am

Thing is, back in the day, steel 72s did not cost very much and I don't remeber them being any more than an aluminum 80 or actually less. The overlap in time between when steel 72s went away and modern type aluminum 80s came on the scene was small however. I think it is because steel tanks rust up in sea water and a spate of incidents with the plastic lined tanks that haunts us to this day. I don't think it was cost. Does anyone have a price list from back then?

James

User avatar
YankDownUnder
Master Diver
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact: Website

Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:58 am

I have a friend who runs the scuba repair shop which local dives shops turn to. He has been in the business for 20 years now. He tests fire department scba tanks, and the equipment used on ships. I spoke to the employee who actually tests the tanks. His name is Ross. He has spent most of his working day for the last 4 years testing tanks. He said he does not remember failing a steel 72 and they are tested annually here in Australia.

Aluminum tanks can suffer sustained load cracking and seem to fail more often he said. If steels are used with high oxygen content and get moisture in them, they can rust rather quickly. If the rust is caught in time, it can be stopped by tumbling or brushing. Most tanks will test okay unless there has been neglect ie. moisture inside according to the owner.

The only prices I have are in my collection of local diving magazines and books from the 50s. In 1955 most rigs were sold complete with regulator and harness. A USD single was $160, a twin was $260, and Navy triples sold for $295. (Ref. DIVE, Carrier first edition, 1955. Aluminums did not hit the market for another 10 to 15 years I believe. I bought my first aluminum 72s in 1971.

dhaas
Lung Diver
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:23 pm
Location: Stow OH
Contact: Website

Aluminum Tank popularity

Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:29 am

Amigos,

Aluminums have failed very minimally considering the bazillions being used out there every day. A gang of Luxfer tanks is the only known neck thrread cracking scenario, and this is so minimal s to be not even considered.

They DO have some buoyanncy differences you have to adjust for, but not a big deal.

AS JES states price, plus the fact that dive resorts / ops using them year after year in salt water gained a maintenance advantage over steel.

I have 3 aluminum 80s (one over 20 years old) plus two low PSI steel 72s for vintage gear (I have an old Mistral with skinny yoke and a Conshelf VI).

Each for a specific purpose....

dhaas

dhaas
Lung Diver
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:23 pm
Location: Stow OH
Contact: Website

tanks

Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:35 am

GEEZ,

We need a way to go back and EDIT our posts, plus I need to double and triple check my spellin' before hitting the "Submit" key :)

dhaas

User avatar
Nemrod
VDH Moderator
Posts: 1435
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:53 pm
First Name: James
Location: Kansas

Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:31 pm

When did steel 72 go out of production? I think the last one I bought new would have been around 1976. Since I was a poor college student I did not buy the expensive aluminum tanks.

The bad alloy Luxfers are the only incidents of neck cracking and it was minimal. There is a FAQ on the Luxfer page for this that dispells all the myths.

Everyone claims there are all these steel 72s around but in the four years or so I have been looking for them these are the only three unlined--unrusted--in hydro--sreel 72s I have come across. That is why I was and am SO HAPPY. I hope to pick up a couple of more fine specimens of the breed and maybe some steel 38s or such as that as money and good fortune permit.

James

User avatar
Bryan
Plank Owner
Posts: 5279
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:40 am
First Name: Bryan
Location: Wesley Chapel Florida
Contact: Website

Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:32 pm

Rip and I have discussed the edit thing and there is NO easy way to allow everyone the ability to edit posts on this style forum. All members would have to be made moderators with admin ability and that's not going to happen. If I have a long reply to do, I usually do it in word or E-mail and spell and grammar check and then paste it here.....I know it's a pain, just and idea though.
Doing it right should include some common sense, not just blindly following specs and instructions. .Gary D, AWAP on SB

User avatar
1969ivan1
Plank Owner
Posts: 1656
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:15 pm
First Name: rob
Location: CINCINNATI, OHIO

Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:35 pm

i donnt seee a probleem with speeling erors?

Return to “Classic Vintage Diving”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests